Sunday, February 28, 2021
TNPSC GROUP 4 GENERAL ENGLISH STUDY MATERIAL PART 1
Monday, February 22, 2021
PARTITION OF BENGAL(1947)
The Partition of Bengal in 1947 isolated Bengal into the two separate elements of West Bengal having a place with India, and East Bengal having a place with Pakistan. This was essential for the Partition of India and authoritatively occurred during August 14-August 15, 1947. East Bengal was renamed East Pakistan, and later turned into the free country of Bangladesh after the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971. At the point when plans for a different Muslim state were first proposed, Bengal was excluded. Allies of Pakistan contended that just in their own state would Muslims have the option to thrive, that they would be victimized in a Hindu-lion's share autonomous India. As Britain resolved to concede freedom and to do as such straightaway after the finish of World War II, the public authority started to consider tolerating to be as the speediest, most down to earth arrangement. Bengal had been separated before, in 1905. This filled an upsurge of patriot opinion across India. In 1911, Bengal had been reunified. Hindus had contradicted the 1905 segment, while Muslims, who profited by this, were more thoughtful. In 1947, when the two networks decided on leftover in India or joining Pakistan, it was the Hindus who decided in favor of segment. The public authority of Bengal upheld a brought together, free Bengal as a third state.
Substance
1 Background
1.1 Failed 1905 segment
1.2 The two-country proposal
2 Bengali: 1947 Vote on Partition
2.1 The Act of Partition
3 Legacy
4 See too
5 Notes
6 References
7 Credits
The British rejected this alternative. Different regions would likewise need autonomy, bringing about an excessive number of non-feasible states. Most of Muslims selected to join Pakistan yet needed to take the entire region with them. They didn't pick parcel. In 1971, they affirmed their social contrast from West Pakistan to become Bangladesh. All through all conversations about segment, some needed a brought together Bengal. A few Bengalis consistently focused on their social and etymological character across the strict separation, stating Bengali fortitude. There is, surely, a solid current in Bengali writing communicating human solidarity, past however including the solidarity of the Bengali public. Parcel fizzled, on account of Bengal, to regard a people's certification of fortitude. A world local area that intends to set up worldwide collaboration, that needs to limit and at last annul all contention, requires to assemble spans between networks, not to segment them. The potential for connect building lived profound inside Bengali history and culture; deplorably, conditions plotted to ride unpleasant shod over this for the sake of political convenience.
Foundation
As the Indian autonomy development acquired energy, Britain additionally lost her will to administer India. At the point when Clement Attlee's new Labor organization came to control in July 1945, Lord Mountbatten was immediately designated Governor-General of India with directions to end frontier rule at the earliest opportunity. He was named February 21, 1947. The freedom battle was driven by the Indian National Congress, which had initially lobbied for expanded Indian investment in administration. Notwithstanding, since 1905, full autonomy had become the solitary satisfactory objective. The bombed 1905 parcel was a pivotal impetus in moving Indian assessment away from restricted self-administration towards complete freedom.
Bombed 1905 segment
Purportedly an authoritative accommodation to convey better administration to the enormous and crowded area of Bengal, the 1905 segment partitioned the Hindu lion's share West from the Muslim dominant part East, albeit significant minorities stayed on one or the other side. The 1905 parcel was famous among the Muslims in the East, who presently had their own territory. In any case, Hindus on the two sides of the separated territory contradicted parcel. A progression of shows, strikes, and a blacklist of British products started, with help from across India. Parcel was viewed as a demonstration of provincial self-importance and accused on the gap and rule strategy. "Calcutta," says Metcalf, "woke up with assemblies, huge fires of unfamiliar products, petitions, papers and banners." Anti-British and supportive of self-rule assumption increased.[1] indeed, the Swadeshi development itself arose out of resistance to Partition, which was viewed as "a vile majestic plan to handicap the Bengali drove patriot movement."[2]
Hindu Bengalis were among the most vocal defenders of Indian patriotism. A significant number of the "Hindus who were considered "hostile if not rebellious in character" lived in the east" and ruled "the entire tone of Bengal administration."[3] By partitioning the territory, the British wanted to gag their voice since they would end up encompassed by a Muslim lion's share. The arrangement exploded backward. Rather than gagging the defenders of freedom, the development built up speed across India. The INC started to effectively advance swaraj (self-rule), swadeshi (independence), and public pride. By adding extra domains to East Bengal, the 1905 segment had additionally left Bengali speakers a minority in their own region.
The two-country proposition
The first page of Now or Never flyer.
Nonetheless, because of segment, the Muslims in the East started to build up their own unmistakable way of life as a social-financial local area, in differentiation from their Hindu neighbors notwithstanding the way that beforehand numerous Bengalis from the two religions had supported Bengali patriotism. Despite the fact that Partition was repealed in 1911, Muslims in the East had a sample of what it resembled to rule the legislature.[4] In 1906, at Dhaka capital of what was still East Bengal, the Muslim League was shaped with the unequivocal reason for safeguarding the interests of the Muslims of India should Hindus decide to sabotage these, either in an India where Indians had a more prominent job in administration or in a free India where they would comprise a lion's share. By 1916, the League and the INC concurred that different electorates ought to be set up to ensure communitarian interests. This became law in 1919. thus, the quantity of Muslim seats expanded in the Bengal Legislature.[5] At the Muslim League meeting in 1930, the thinker artist lawmaker, Muhammad Iqbal initially proposed the possibility of a different state for Muslims. In that this would comprise of lion's share Muslim regions, which would need to be apportioned off from Hindu-greater part zones, it followed the 1905 Partition of Bengal. Some topographical particularity was given to the country of a different Muslim state by Choudhary Rahmat Ali in "Presently or Never; Are We to Live or Perish Forever?" (January 28, 1933) recommending that a state called Pakistan could be framed from Punjab, Afghanistan Province, Kashmir, Sind, Baluchistan. Just as being an abbreviation, Pakistan implies the "place where there is the unadulterated." This got known as the two-country postulation; Hindus and Muslims were each a country and when autonomy came two separate country states ought to be set up.
It was muddled whether Bengal was to be incorporated, given the disappointment of the 1905 parcel the still solid albeit less solid presence of a cross-strict Bengali patriotism. Afterward, when it was brought up to Rahmat Ali that he had excluded Bengal, he proposed that the Bengali Muslims should shape their own, third state, which may be classified "Bangistan."[6]
Bengali: 1947 Vote on Partition
The two parts of Pakistan.
In 1932, another mutual honor expanded the quantity of Muslim seats in the council once more. From 1937, the Muslims were a greater part in the Legislature and framed the public authority until August 1947. Out of 250 seats, 119 were saved for Muslims; what's more, they won different seats also. The Muslim League, however, didn't shape the public authority until 1946, when Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy became boss priest. On August 16, 1946, the Muslim League's public chief, Muhammad Jinnah called a Direct Action Day after the INC had dismissed the two-country proposition. In Calcutta, this transformed into a craze of Hindu-Muslim revolting in which as much as 4,000 individuals, principally Hindu, kicked the bucket. Suhrawardy has been blamed for coordinating this trying to design the socioeconomics to arrange the deck much more in the Muslims' kindness. However he was additionally proposing a solitary, sovereign state for all Bengalis as was connecting with draw in Hindu support.[7] Jinnah was not restricted to this arrangement and the British showed some level of compassion. A few Muslims in the West didn't see Bengali Islam as sufficiently unadulterated, being excessively affected by Hinduism and they didn't actually need Bengal remembered for the Muslim state. Afterward, Suhrawardy was momentarily PM of Pakistan 1956 until 1957.
By August 1947, Mountbatten had gotten convinced that exclusively by consenting to Partition could he desire to see a rapid finish to British principle. London established that common council vote on whether to join India or Pakistan. In those regions which would be apportioned, separate votes would be taken by every local area. A lion's share for segment from either segment would decide the result. In any case, in the Muslim-lion's share east, the movement was not to "segment" but rather for the entire, joined region to join Pakistan, for which 166 to 35 in casted a ballot in courtesy. Nonetheless, the vote in the Western area supported parcel by 58-21, with the West joining India and the East Pakistan.[8] Almost positively because of the wedge that Britain's gap and rule strategy had driven among Hindus and Muslims in Bengal, segment followed pretty much along similar segment lines as it had in 1905, then again, actually just the Muslim Sylhet locale of Assam (which had been important for East Bengal 1905-1911) casted a ballot in a submission to join (by a larger part of 55,578 votes) what was to turn out to be East Pakistan. Mountbatten didn't permit the governing body to cast a ballot "for free Bengal," since, he said, "at that point others would likewise need independence."[9] Indeed, the Maharajah of Kashmir would likewise take the view that his state need join ne
Sunday, February 21, 2021
25 Quotes to Inspire Success in Your Life
GOOD MORNING,
What is success? There are many definitions, but there's one thing all the greats agree on: Success only comes by persevering despite failure.
Here are 50 quotes to inspire you to succeed in the face of failures, setbacks, and barriers.
1. "Success is not final; failure is not fatal: It is the courage to continue that counts."
-- Winston S. Churchill
2. "It is better to fail in originality than to succeed in imitation."
-- Herman Melville
3. "The road to success and the road to failure are almost exactly the same."
-- Colin R. Davis
4. "Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it."
-- Henry David Thoreau
5. "Opportunities don't happen. You create them."
-- Chris Grosser
6. "Don't be afraid to give up the good to go for the great."
--John D. Rockefeller
7. "I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have."
-- Thomas Jefferson
8. "There are two types of people who will tell you that you cannot make a difference in this world: those who are afraid to try and those who are afraid you will succeed."
-- Ray Goforth
9. "Successful people do what unsuccessful people are not willing to do. Don't wish it were easier; wish you were better."
10. "Try not to become a man of success. Rather become a man of value."
-- Albert Einstein
11. "Never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense."
-- Winston Churchill
12. "Stop chasing the money and start chasing the passion."
-- Tony Hsieh
13. "Success is walking from failure to failure with no loss of enthusiasm."
-- Winston Churchill
14. "I owe my success to having listened respectfully to the very best advice, and then going away and doing the exact opposite."
-- G. K. Chesterton
15. "Would you like me to give you a formula for success? It's quite simple, really: Double your rate of failure. You are thinking of failure as the enemy of success. But it isn't at all. You can be discouraged by failure or you can learn from it, so go ahead and make mistakes. Make all you can. Because remember that's where you will find success."
-- Thomas J. Watson
16. "If you are not willing to risk the usual, you will have to settle for the ordinary."
- Jim Rohn
17. "The ones who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones that do."
-- Anonymous
18. "Do one thing every day that scares you."
-- Anonymous
19. "All progress takes place outside the comfort zone."
-- Michael John Bobak
20. "People who succeed have momentum. The more they succeed, the more they want to succeed, and the more they find a way to succeed. Similarly, when someone is failing, the tendency is to get on a downward spiral that can even become a self-fulfilling prophecy."
-- Tony Robbins
21. "Don't let the fear of losing be greater than the excitement of winning."
-- Robert Kiyosaki
22. "If you really look closely, most overnight successes took a long time."
-- Steve Jobs
23. "The real test is not whether you avoid this failure, because you won't. It's whether you let it harden or shame you into inaction, or whether you learn from it; whether you choose to persevere."
-- Barack Obama
24. "The only limit to our realization of tomorrow will be our doubts of today."
-- Franklin D. Roosevelt
25. "Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, ambition inspired, and success achieved."
-- Helen Keller
Wednesday, February 17, 2021
Tamilnadu 12th Time Table 2021 (Out): Check TN Class 12 Time Table Here
TN 12th Exam Dates | Subjects |
---|---|
03-May | Language |
05-May | English |
07-May | Communicative English/ Ethics And |
11-May | Physics/ Economics/ Computer Technology |
17-May | Mathematics/ Zoology/ Commerce/ Micro-biology/ Nutrition Dietetics/ Textile & Dress Designing/ Food Service Management/ Agricultural Science/ Nursing (General)/ Nursing Vocational |
19-May | Biology/ Botany/ History / Business Mathematics and Statistics / Basic Electrical Engineering/ Basic Electronics Engineering/ Basic Civil Engineering/ Basic Automobile Engineering/ Basic Mechanical |
21-May | Chemistry/accountancy/ Geography |
GOD SEES THE TRUTH BUT WAITS BY LEO TOLSTOY
Here is a story about faith, forgiveness, freedom and acceptance of a young merchant named Aksionov, who was sent to prison for a crime he didn’t commit.
In the town of Vladimir lived a young merchant named Ivan Dmitrich Aksionov. He had two shops and a house of his own.
Aksionov was a handsome, fairhaired, curly-headed fellow, full of fun, and very fond of singing. When quite a young man he had been given to drink, and was riotous when he had had too much; but after he married he gave up drinking, except now and then.
One summer Aksionov was going to the Nizhny Fair, and as he bade good-bye to his family, his wife said to him, “Ivan Dmitrich, do not start to-day; I have had a bad dream about you.” Aksionov laughed, and said, “You are afraid that when I get to the fair I shall go on a spree.”
His wife replied: “I do not know what I am afraid of; all I know is that I had a bad dream. I dreamt you returned from the town, and when you took off your cap I saw that your hair was quite grey.”
Aksionov laughed. “That’s a lucky sign,” said he. “See if I don’t sell out all my goods, and bring you some presents from the fair.”
So he said good-bye to his family, and drove away. When he had travelled half-way, he met a merchant whom he knew, and they put up at the same inn for the night. They had some tea together, and then went to bed in adjoining rooms.
It was not Aksionov’s habit to sleep late, and, wishing to travel while it was still cool, he aroused his driver before dawn, and told him to put in the horses.
Then he made his way across to the landlord of the inn (who lived in a cottage at the back), paid his bill, and continued his journey.
When he had gone about twenty-five miles, he stopped for the horses to be fed. Aksionov rested awhile in the passage of the inn, then he stepped out into the porch, and, ordering a samovar to be heated, got out his guitar and began to play.
Suddenly a troika drove up with tinkling bells and an official alighted, followed by two soldiers. He came to Aksionov and began to question him, asking him who he was and whence he came. Aksionov answered him fully, and said, “Won’t you have some tea with me?” But the official went on cross-questioning him and asking him. “Where did you spend last night? Were you alone, or with a fellow-merchant? Did you see the other merchant this morning? Why did you leave the inn before dawn?”
Aksionov wondered why he was asked all these questions, but he described all that had happened, and then added, “Why do you cross-question me as if I were a thief or a robber? I am travelling on business of my own, and there is no need to question me.”
Then the official, calling the soldiers, said, “I am the police-officer of this district, and I question you because the merchant with whom you spent last night has been found with his throat cut. We must search your things.”
They entered the house. The soldiers and the police-officer unstrappedAksionov’s luggage and searched it. Suddenly the officer drew a knife out of a bag, crying, “Whose knife is this?”
Aksionov looked, and seeing a blood-stained knife taken from his bag, he was frightened.
“How is it there is blood on this knife?”
Aksionov tried to answer, but could hardly utter a word, and only stammered: “I--don’t know--not mine.” Then the police-officer said: “This morning the merchant was found in bed with his throat cut. You are the only person who could have done it. The house was locked from inside, and no one else was there. Here is this blood-stained knife in your bag and your face and manner betray you! Tell me how you killed him, and how much money you stole?”
Aksionov swore he had not done it; that he had not seen the merchant after they had had tea together; that he had no money except eight thousand rubles of his own, and that the knife was not his. But his voice was broken, his face pale, and he trembled with fear as though he went guilty.
The police-officer ordered the soldiers to bind Aksionov and to put him in the cart. As they tied his feet togetherand flung him into the cart, Aksionov crossed himself and wept. His money and goods were taken from him, and he was sent to the nearest town and imprisoned there. Enquiries as to his character were made in Vladimir. The merchants and other inhabitants of that town said that in former days he used to drink and waste his time, but that he was a good man. Then the trial came on: he was charged with murdering a merchant from Ryazan, and robbing him of twenty thousand rubles.
His wife was in despair, and did not know what to believe. Her children were all quite small; one was a baby at her breast. Taking them all with her, she went to the town where her husband was in jail. At first she was not allowed to see him; but after much begging, she obtained permission from the officials, and was taken to him. When she saw her husband in prison-dress and in chains, shut up with thieves and criminals, she fell down, and did not come to her senses for a long time. Then she drew her children to her, and sat down near him. She told him of things at home, and asked about what had happened to him. He told her all, and she asked, “What can we do now?”
“We must petition the Czar not to let an innocent man perish.”
His wife told him that she had sent a petition to the Czar, but it had not been accepted.
Aksionov did not reply, but only looked downcast.
Then his wife said, “It was not for nothing I dreamt your hair had turned grey. You remember?
You should not havestarted that day.” And passing her fingers through his hair, she said: “Vanya dearest, tell your wife the truth; was it not you who did it?”
“So you, too, suspect me!” said Aksionov, and, hiding his face in his hands, he began to weep. Then a soldier came to say that the wife and children must go away; and Aksionov said goodbye to his family for the last time.
When they were gone, Aksionov recalled what had been said, and when he remembered that his wife also had suspected him, he said to himself, “It seems that only God can know the truth; it is to Him alone we must appeal, and from Him alone expect mercy.”
And Aksionov wrote no more petitions; gave up all hope, and only prayed to God.
Aksionov was condemned to be flogged and sent to the mines. So he was flogged with a knot, and when the wounds made by the knot were healed, he was driven to Siberia with other convicts.
For twenty-six years Aksionov lived as a convict in Siberia. His hair turned white as snow, and his beard grew long, thin, and grey. All his mirth went; he stooped; he walked slowly, spoke little, and never laughed, but he often prayed.
In prison Aksionov learnt to make boots, and earned a little money, with which he bought The Lives of the Saints. He read this book when there was light enough in the prison; and on Sundays in the prison-church he read the lessons andsang in the choir; for his voice was still good.
The prison authorities liked Aksionov for his meekness, and his fellow-prisoners respected him: they called him “Grandfather,” and “The Saint.” When they wanted to petition the prison authorities about anything, they always made Aksionov their spokesman, and when there were quarrels among the prisoners they came to him to put things right, and to judge the matter.
No news reached Aksionov from his home, and he did not even know if his wife and children were still alive.
One day a fresh gang of convicts came to the prison. In the evening the old prisoners collected round the new ones and asked them what towns or villages they came from, and what they were sentenced for. Among the rest Aksionov sat down near the newcomers, and listened with downcast air to what was said.
One of the new convicts, a tall, strong man of sixty, with a closely-cropped grey beard, was telling the others what be had been arrested for.
“Well, friends,” he said, “I only took a horse that was tied to a sledge, and I was arrested and accused of stealing. I said I had only taken it to get home quicker, and had then let it go; besides, the driver was a personal friend of mine. So I said, ‘It’s all right.’ ‘No,’ said they, ‘you stole it.’ But how or where I stole it they could not say. I once really did something wrong, and ought by rights to have come here long ago, but that time I was not found out. Now I have been sent here for nothing at all... Eh, but it’s lies I’m telling you; I’ve been to Siberia before, but I did not stay long.”
“Where are you from?” asked some one.
“From Vladimir. My family are of that town. My name is Makar, and they also call me Semyonich.”
Aksionov raised his head and said: “Tell me, Semyonich, do you know anything of the merchants Aksionov of Vladimir? Are they still alive?”
“Know them? Of course I do. The Aksionovs are rich, though their father is in Siberia: a sinner like ourselves, it seems! As for you, Gran’dad, how did you come here?”
Aksionov did not like to speak of his misfortune. He only sighed, and said, “For my sins I have been in prison these twenty-six years.” “What sins?” asked Makar Semyonich. But Aksionov only said, “Well, well- -I must have deserved it!” He would have said no more, but his companions toldthe newcomers how Aksionov came to be in Siberia; how someone had killed a merchant, and had put the knife among Aksionov’s things, and Aksionov had been unjustly condemned. When Makar Semyonich heard this, he looked at Aksionov, slapped his own knee, and exclaimed,
“Well, this is wonderful! Really wonderful! But how old you’ve grown, Gran’dad!” The others asked him why he was so surprised, and where he had seen Aksionov before; but Makar Semyonich did not reply. He only said: “It’s wonderful that we should meet here, lads!” These words made Aksionov wonder whether this man knew who had killed the merchant; so he said, “Perhaps, Semyonich, you have heard of that affair, or maybe you’ve seen me before?” “How could I help hearing? The world’s full of rumours. But it’s a long time ago, and I’ve forgotten what I heard.”
“Perhaps you heard who killed the merchant?” asked Aksionov. Makar Semyonich laughed, and replied: “It must have been him in whose bag the knife was found! If some one else hid the knife there, ‘He’s not a thief till he’s caught,’ as the saying is. How could any one put a knife into your bag while it was under your head? It would surely have woke you up.” When Aksionov heard these words, he felt sure this was the man who had killed the merchant. He rose and went away. All that night Aksionov lay awake.
He felt terribly unhappy, and all sorts of images rose in his mind. There was the image of his wife as she was when he parted from her to go to the fair. He saw her as if she were present; her face and her eyes rose before him; he heard her speak and laugh. Then he saw his children, quite little, as they were at that time: one with a little cloak on, another at his mother’s breast.
And then he remembered himself as he used to be–young and merry. He remembered how he sat playing the guitar in the porch of the inn where he was arrested, and how free from care he had been. He saw, in his mind, the place where he was flogged, the executioner, and the people standing around; the chains, the convicts, all the twenty-six years of his prison life, and his premature old age. The thought of it all made him so wretched that he was ready to kill himself. “And it’s all that villain’s doing!” thought Aksionov.
And his anger was so great against Makar Semyonich that he longed for vengeance, even if he himself should perish for it. He kept repeating prayers all night, but could get no peace. During the day he did not go near Makar Semyonich, nor even look at him.
A fortnight passed in this way. Aksionov could not sleep at night, and was so miserable that he did not know what to do. One night as he was walking about the prison he noticed some earth that came rolling out from under one of the shelves on which the prisoners slept.
He stopped to see what it was. Suddenly Makar Semyonich crept out from under the shelf, and looked up at Aksionov witha frightened face. Aksionov tried to pass without looking at him, but Makar seized his hand and told him that he had dug a hole under the wall, getting rid of the earth by putting it into his high-boots, and emptying it out every day on the road when the prisoners were driven to their work.
“Just you keep quiet, old man, and you shall get out too. If you blab, they’ll flog the life out of me, but I will kill you first.” Aksionov trembled with anger as he looked at his enemy. He drew his hand away, saying, “I have no wish to escape, and you have no need to kill me; you killed me long ago! As to telling of you--I may do so or not, as God shall direct.”
Next day, when the convicts were led out to work, the convoy soldiers noticed that one or other of the prisoners emptied some earth out of his boots. The prison was searched and the tunnel found. The Governor came and questioned all the prisoners to find out who had dug the hole. They all denied any knowledge of it. Those who knew would not betray Makar Semyonich, knowing he would be flogged almost to death.
At last the Governor turned to Aksionov whom he knew to be a just man, and said:You are a truthful old man; tell me, before God, who dug the hole?” Makar Semyonich stood as if he were quite unconcerned, looking at the Governor and not so much as glancing at Aksionov.
Aksionov’s lips and hands trembled, and for a long time he could not utter a word. He thought, “Why should I screen him who ruined my life? Let him pay for what I have suffered. But if I tell, they will probably flog the life out of him, and maybe I suspect him wrongly. And, after all, what good would it be to me?” “Well, old man,” repeated the Governor, “tell me the truth: who has been digging under the wall?” Aksionov glanced at Makar Semyonich, and said, “I cannot say, your honour. It is not God’s will that I should tell! Do what you like with me; I am your hands.” However much the Governor tried, Aksionov would say no more, and so the matter had to be left.
That night, when Aksionov was lying on his bed and just beginning to doze, someone came quietly and sat down on his bed. He peered through the darkness and recognised Makar. “What more do you want of me?” asked Aksionov. “Why have you come here?” Makar Semyonich was silent. So Aksionov sat up and said, “What do you want? Go away, or I will call the guard!”
Makar Semyonich bent close over Aksionov, and whispered, “Ivan Dmitrich, forgive me!” “What for?” asked Aksionov. “It was I who killed the merchant and hid the knife among your things. I meant to kill you too, but I heard a noise outside, so I hid the knife in your bag and escaped out of the window.” Aksionov was silent, and did not know what to say. Makar Semyonich slid off the bed-shelf and knelt upon the ground.
“Ivan Dmitrich,” said he, “forgive me! For the love of God, forgive me! I will confess that it was I who killed the merchant, and you will be released and can go to your home.” “It is easy for you to talk,” said Aksionov, “but I have suffered for you these twenty-six years. Where could I go to now?... My wife is dead, and my children have forgotten me. I have nowhere to go...” Makar Semyonich did not rise, but beat his head on the floor. “Ivan Dmitrich, forgive me!” he cried. “When they flogged me with the knot it was not so hard to bear as it is to see you now ... yet you had pity on me, and did not tell. For Christ’s sake forgive me, wretch that I am!”
And he began to sob. When Aksionov heard him sobbing he, too, began to weep. “God will forgive you!” said he. “Maybe I am a hundred times worse than you.” And at these words his heart grew light, and the longing for home left him. He no longer had any desire to leave the prison, but only hoped for his last hour to come.In spite of what Aksionov had said, Makar Semyonich confessed his guilt. But when the order for his release came, Aksionov was already dead.
ABOUT THE AURTHOR:
Leo Tolstoy was born on September 9, 1828, in Tula Province, Russia. He is best known for the novels War and Peace (1869) and Anna Karenina (1877), often cited as pinnacles of realist fiction. He first achieved literary acclaim in his twenties with his semi-autobiographical trilogy, Childhood, Boyhood, and Youth and Sevastopol Sketches, based upon his experiences in the Crimean War. Tolstoy’s fiction includes dozens of short stories and several novellas such as The Death of Ivan Ilyich (1886), Family Happiness, and Hadji Murad. He also wrote plays and numerous philosophical essays. Tolstoy died on November 20, 1910 in Astapovo, Russia.
Monday, February 8, 2021
தன்னேர் இலாத தமிழ் 12 ஆம் வகுப்பு இயல் 1 செய்யுள்
தன்னேர் இலாத தமிழ்
ஓங்கலிடை வந்து உயர்ந்தோர் தொழ விளங்கி
ஏங்கொலிநீர் ஞாலத்(து) இருளகற்றும் - ஆங்கவற்றுள்
மின்னேர் தனியாழி வெங்கதிரொன்(று) ஏனையது
தன்னேர் இலாத தமிழ்! *
பா வகை : நேரிசை வெண்பா
பாடலின் பொருள்: மக்களால் போற்றப்பட்டு , உயர்ந்த மலைகளுக்கு இடையே தோன்றி, கடலால் சூழப்பட்ட உலகத்தின் பு ற இ ரு ளை அகற்றுவது ஒன்று. பொதிகை மலை யில் தோன்றி, சான்றோர்கள் தொ ழ ப்பட் டு , மக்களின் அறியாமை என்னும் அக இருளைப் போக்குவதோடு ஒப்புவமை இல்லாததுமாக இருப்பது இன்னொன்று. இருளைப் போக்கும் இவ்விரண்டில் ஒன்று ஒளிர்கின்ற கதிரவன்; இன்னொன்று தனக்கு நிகரில்லாத தமிழ்.
Friday, February 5, 2021
PYTHON PROGRAM TO REVERSE A STRING
PYTHON PROGRAM TO REVERSE A STRING
string=input("Please enter your own string:")
string2=" "
for i in string:
string2=i+string2
print("\n The Original string=", string)
print("The Reversed string=", string2)
OUTPUT:
*Please enter your own string:RAJU
The Original string= RAJU
The Reversed string= UJAR
Thursday, February 4, 2021
PYTHON PROGRAM TO CHECK WHETHER THE GIVEN INPUT IS ODD OR EVEN
num=int(input("Enter a number:"))
if (num%2)==0:
print("{0} is even".format(num))
else:
print("{0} is odd".format(num))
OUTPUT:
* Enter a number:6
6 is even
Tuesday, February 2, 2021
Trigonometrical Ratios Table
The Trigonometrical ratios table will help us to find the values of trigonometric standard angles.
The standard angles of trigonometrical ratios are 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°.
The values of trigonometrical ratios of standard angles are very important to solve the trigonometrical problems. Therefore, it is necessary to remember the value of the trigonometrical ratios of these standard angles. The sine, cosine and tangent of the standard angles are given below in the table.
Trigonometric Table in Sexages
Trigonometric Table in Circular System
Note: Values of sin θ and cos θ lies between 0 and 1 (both inclusive)
To remember the above values:
(a) divide the numbers 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 by 4,
(b) take the positive square roots,
(c) these numbers given the values of sin 0°, sin 30°, sin 45°, sin 60° and sin 90° respectively.
(d) write the values of sin 0°, sin 30°, sin 45°, sin 60° and sin 90° in reverse order and get the values of cos 0°, cos 30°, cos 45°, cos 60° and cos 90° respectively.
If θ be an acute angle, the values of sin θ and cos θ lies between 0 and 1 (both inclusive).
The sine of the standard angles 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° are respectively the positive square roots of 0/4,1/4, 2/4,3/4 and 4/4
Therefore,
sin 0° = √(0/4) = 0
sin 30° = √(1/4) = ½
sin 45° = √(2/4) = 1/√2 = √2/2
sin 60° = √3/4 = √3/2;
cos 90° = √(4/4) = 1.
Similarly cosine of the above standard angels are respectively the positive square roots of 4/4, 3/4, 2/4, 1/4, 0/4
Therefore,
cos 0° = √(4/4) = 1
cos 30° = √(3/4) = √3/2
cos 45° = 1
cos 60° = √(1/4) = 1/2
cos 90° = √(0/4) = 0.
Since, we know the sin and cos value of the standard angles from the trigonometrical ratios table; therefore we can easily find the values of the other trigonometrical ratios of the standard angles.
The tangent of the standard angles 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°:
tan 0° = 0
tan 30° = √3/3
tan 45° = √(2/4) = 1/√2 = √2/2
tan 60° = √3
tan 90° = not defined.
The cosine of the standard angles 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°:
csc 0° = not defined.
csc 30° = 2
csc 45° = √2
csc 60° = 2√3/3
csc 90° = 1.
The secant of the standard angles 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°:
sec 0° = 1
sec 30° = 2√3/3
sec 45° = √2
sec 60° = 2
sec 90° = not defined.
The cotangent of the standard angles 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°:
cot 0° = not defined.
cot 30° = √3
cot 45° = 1
cot 60° = √3/3
cot 90° = 0
IIT-Madras invites applications second batch of online data science programme, JEE scores not needed
IIT-Madras invites applications second batch of online data science programme, JEE scores not needed As a part of the application process, ...
-
Dr APJ Abdul Kalam’s 6th death is being celebrated across the country today. Kalam was an Indian aerospace scientist and politician who serv...
-
TNPSC GROUP 4 GENERAL ENGLISH STUDY MATERIAL FAMOUS QUOTES 1. Take up one idea, make that one idea your life- think of it, dream of it, li...
-
தன்னேர் இலாத தமிழ் ஓங்கலிடை வந்து உயர்ந்தோர் தொழ விளங்கி ஏங்கொலிநீர் ஞாலத்(து) இருளகற்றும் - ஆங்கவற்றுள...